Chinese Tire Investigation Shows ‘Pervasive Underselling at High Margins’
Photo: Jim Park
">Photo: Jim Park
">The International Trade Commission says there's evidence of “significant” underselling of Chinese truck and bus tires from 2013 to 2015, and that the underselling margins generally increased over that time frame.
Yet, the ITC voted not to impose tariffs on those imported tires.
“We do not find that subject imports depressed U.S. producers' prices to a significant degree.”
Here's what this publication is learning as we wade through the ITC's final report following its decision not to place tariffs on truck and bus tires from China.
In the final phase of its investigation, five domestic tire producers and 27 importers provided usable pricing data on four tires for drive applications (excluding all-position) tires:
size 11R22.5, 16 ply rating, load range of H, speed rating L (75 mph)size 11R24.5, 16 ply rating, load range of H, speed rating L (75 mph)size 295/75R22.5, 14 ply rating, load range of G, speed rating L (75 mph)size 285/75R24.5, 14 ply rating, load range of G, speed rating L (75 mph)The commission says prices for domestic truck and bus tires declined between the first quarter of 2013 and the fourth quarter of 2015 for both original equipment and aftermarket sales on all four of the specified products.
“While subject import prices also generally declined, the record does not support a finding that subject imports caused price declines for domestically produced truck and bus tires.
“In particular, the record indicates changes in the cost of underlying raw materials affect the price of truck and bus tires. By any metric observed, raw material costs fell by considerably more than the price of domestically produced truck and bus tires during the period of investigation. Between January 2013 and December 2015, the price of rubber, the primary raw material used in the production of truck and bus tires, fell precipitously.”
In that same two-year ...Read the rest of this story
