Author: Vitaliy Dadalyan

DOT, EPA Release Phase 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regs

Major North American truck OEMs are poised to unleash a whole new slate of diesel engines designed to meet Phase 1 of the federal greenhouse gas emissions regulations, which go into effect in January. But on Tuesday, the industry found out what Phase 2 will involve.

The White House, in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental Agency and the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, announced Phase 2 greenhouse gas emissions regulations, which will finalize emission and fuel economy standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles.

The new measures were drafted in response to President Obama's directive to the agencies in early 2014 to codify new standards that will shape medium- and heavy-duty powertrain design and emission performance through the next decade.

The EPA also announced it will work with the California Air Resources Board to evaluate future emissions standards with an eye toward further reducing NOx emissions from diesel exhaust.

The final vehicle and engine performance standards were developed with input from the automotive and trucking industries, environmental groups, labor unions and other concerned parties. They will cover semi-trucks, large pickups and vans and all types of buses and work trucks in model years from 2021-2027.

According to government officials, the new standards will result in significant GHG emissions reductions and fuel efficiency improvements across all of these vehicle types. When the standards are fully phased in, tractors in a tractor-trailer combination are expected to achieve up to 25% lower carbon dioxide emissions and fuel consumption than an equivalent tractor in 2018.

The Highlights

Phase II of the new GHG rules is designed to promote a new generation of cleaner, more fuel-efficient trucks by encouraging the wider application of currently available technologies and the development of new and advanced cost-effective technologies through model year 2027.

The final standards are expected to lower CO2 emissions by approximately 1.1 billion metric tons, save vehicle owners fuel costs of about $170 billion, and reduce oil consumption by up to 2 billion barrels over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program. Overall, according to EPA and NHTSA, the program will provide $230 billion in net benefits to society including benefits to our climate and the public health of Americans.

The final rule apparently has more ambitious efficiency goals than the proposed rule unveiled last year, but a phased-in approach should help prevent sticker shock and forced adoption of not-quite-ready-for-prime-time technologies.

Key points in Phase 2 GHG rules include:
• 10% more GHG and fuel consumption reductions;
• More robust compliance provisions, including improved test procedures, enhanced enforcement audits, and protection against defeat devices;
• More stringent diesel engine standards
• An improved vocational vehicle program with a regulatory structure better tailored to match the right technology for the job;
• Maintaining the structure and incremental phase-in of the proposed standards, allowing manufacturers to choose their own technology mix and giving them the lead time needed to ensure those technologies are reliable and durable.

Trailers, Too

And, for the first time, EPA and NHTSA announced they are also finalizing fuel efficiency and GHG standards for trailers. These new standards will have staggered effective dates, with EPA regulations taking effect in the 2018 model year, and NHTSA standards becoming law in 2021.

OEMs can apply for, and receive, credits for early and voluntary participation with the new standards, which will promote cost-effective fuel economy technologies for trailers – including aerodynamic devices, lightweight construction and self-inflating tires. According to EPA and NHTSA, these measures can significantly reduce total fuel consumption by tractor-trailers, while paying back the owners in less than two years due to the fuel saved.

Recognizing that many trailer manufacturers are small businesses, the program includes provisions such as a one-year delay in initial standards for small businesses and simplified certification requirements.

Trucking Cautiously Optimistic

Reaction from the trucking industry in the wake of the announcement was reserved, but cautiously optimistic that the new standards would be achievable without significant technological additions to new trucks and tractors.

Nic Lutsey, program director with the International Council for Clean Transportation, said the Phase 2 standards will require up to a 30% reduction in fuel use per mile for tractor-trailers, compared to 2017 levels. He noted that the regulations will drive fuel-saving technologies into the market that ICCT research has shown can increase typical highway fuel economy from 6 to 7 mpg today up to above 8 mpg and deliver payback periods within two years.

The rule requires a 16 to 19% efficiency improvement for vocational vehicles and 16% for heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans.


“With an estimated payback period of within two years for tractor-trailers, these standards hit the mark,” Lutsey said. “There are a lot of available and ready-to-be-deployed technologies, and this regulation ensures that the most cost-effective of those technologies see more widespread use.”

Daimler Trucks North America President and CEO Martin Daum said his company is pleased that the EPA and NHTSA chose a non-disruptive implementation of the standard, allowing the industry over a decade to phase in technical changes. According to Daum, this approach ensures that no unrealistic cost of acquisition pressure will be placed on Daimler customers and will help avoid unnecessary burden on the cost of transportation, which is essential for the prosperity and competitiveness of the economy.

“The United States is facing significant challenges regarding GHG reduction as well as its continued dependence on foreign oil," Daum said in a statement. "DTNA will continue to work closely with the EPA, NHTSA, and our partners to develop new solutions that will have a positive environmental impact and fuel efficiency gains for our customers that are harmonious with the Phase Two standards.

“DTNA supports regulations which reduce GHG emissions as well as diesel consumption. As we have stated through the collaborative debate on the Phase Two rule, the final rule needed to provide clear, long-term targets for the entire vehicle, not just the engine. It also needed to provide enough time and flexibility for the OEMs and customers to decide themselves how to achieve the reductions in a way that is economically feasible."

Srikanth Padmanabhan, president of Cummins Engine Business, said Cummins is already “well-positioned” to develop products that comply with this new rule while meeting customer needs. “We are pleased that the rule builds on the Phase 1 regulatory framework that recognizes the diversity and complexity of the commercial vehicle sector," he said.

He also urged the EPA and CARB to work collaboratively toward the the goal of maintaining a national, heavy‐duty NOx and GHG program, adding, “Cummins is committed to working with both agencies to determine the best path for achieving real‐world reductions.”

EPA also released a letter from Mike Britt, director of advanced engineering for United Parcel Service to Chris Grundler, director of EPA's Office of Transportation and Quality, in support of the new regulations. In the letter, Britt said UPS “applauds” the two agencies for doing a thorough, professional, and comprehensive assessment of the current state and potential of future technology.

“We need and can achieve much higher efficiency in our trucks,” Britt writes. “The fuel economy targets established by the agencies are both forward-looking and feasible. We believe the long lead times should allow the truck manufacturers and suppliers ample time to plan for and prepare for the implementation of the necessary technologies.”


American Trucking Associations President Chris Spear said in a statement that ATA has been evaluating GHG proposals from EPA and NHTSA since the second round of standards were announced in 2015 to determine their potential impacts on the trucking industry and has been in constant dialogue with fleets, suppliers, and manufacturers to make sure that Phase 2 could be effectively implemented.

"ATA developed and adopted a set of 15 guiding principles to serve as our major parameters for inclusion in the final rule," said ATA Vice President and Energy and Environmental Counsel Glen Kedzie. "We are pleased that our concerns such as adequate lead-time for technology development, national harmonization of standards, and flexibility for manufacturers have been heard and included in the final rule.

"While efficiency milestones for vehicles, engines and trailers have all been slightly increased over the agencies' initial proposal, we are encouraged that they addressed several important issues in the final rule including undertaking annual rule assessments, not accelerating compliance timelines from those originally proposed and refining emissions modeling based on industry data," he said.

"However, while the potential for real cost savings and environmental benefits under this rule are there, fleets will ultimately determine the success or failure of this rule based on their comfort level purchasing these new technologies."



ATA's Spear said the associaiton will "continue to work with its members and the agencies to ensure that the objectives of this regulation are achieved. For that to happen, however, the process adopted by EPA and NHTSA must remain transparent, accommodating and sensitive to the concerns of manufacturers and fleets, as they are the ones who ultimately must bear the burden of complying with these new requirements."

Follow @HDTrucking on Twitter

Phase 2 GHG rules cast broad net

Federal agencies also working to fix “misalignment” between Phase 1 EPA GHG standards and NHTSA fuel efficiency standards to eliminate differences.

The final Phase 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) rules governing heavy-duty trucks and engines issued today by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) – a rule that covers 1,690 pages – will seek to tighten oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and methane emissions as well as “clarify” the classification of natural gas engines and other gaseous-fueled he

read more

People, IT security, and trucking

Here's probably what should be a well-known – if highly ironic – strategy when it comes to protecting trucking's information technology (IT) systems from data breaches and hack attacks: you need detailed and repeated employee training.

Yep, the best data defense is once again the human beings who use IT systems every day, in every way, to perform their freight-related tasks.

read more

Orange EV Launches Class 8 Electric Truck

<img width="150" src="http://www.automotive-fleet.com/fc_images/news/m-orangeev-1.jpg" border="0" alt="

Orange EV's all-new Class 8 pure-electric terminal truck. (Photo courtesy of Orange EV.)

">

Orange EV's all-new Class 8 pure-electric terminal truck. (Photo courtesy of Orange EV.)

">

Orange EV, a manufacturer of electrification solutions for industrial fleets, is now accepting orders for its all-new T-Series pure-electric terminal truck.

The new T-Series pure-electric truck has 24-plus hours of use per charge, and can be fully charged in as few as two hours.

In addition, fuel savings depending on moderate or heavy use can be from $10,000 per year, per vehicle up to $60,000 per year, per vehicle (using 2015 average diesel prices). A fleet of 20 vehicles, with moderate use, can save from $200,000 to $400,000 per year overall, according to Orange EV.

Orange EV's initial T-Series, a complete remanufacture of existing trucks, has been operating up to 24-plus hours per charge at sites from single-shift to 24x7 in railroad intermodal, LTL freight, manufacturing, retail distribution, waste management, and warehouse container handling fleets.

By placing a $10,000 refundable deposit by Dec. 31, 2016, fleets lock in the price, receive production priority, and Orange EV's telematics service free of charge on trucks (the telematics service will be provided free of charge on all trucks ordered by March 31, 2017.)

“With the addition of the new truck and rise in overall order volume, production capacity is at a premium,” said Wayne Mathisen, CEO at Orange EV. “Fleets have been telling us for two years that they want a new truck option. Now they can get it in the same industry-leading chassis they already know and rely on. Orange EV's Priority Program will help us gauge the demand and allocate resources while rewarding fleets that help us plan ahead.”

Fleets in the Priority Program place $10,000 refundable deposits and enjoy:

  • Price stability through year-end budgeting.
  • Installation and remote access for Orange EV's FIMS service, free of charge for five years.
  • Live user training and initial Fleet Information Management System (FIMS) user reports. The FIMS telematics service provides real-time information on truck performance.

Orange EV will continue taking orders as fleets are ready. Each month, the company will query program participants in sequence for their orders to help new fleets begin the process while ensuring ready units begin their deployments as soon as possible.

Financing, incentives, carbon credits, and other programs provide fleets additional assistance and incentives to accelerate deployment of Orange EV's pure electric terminal trucks. Traditional equipment financing helps reduce initial cash outlay and fund the balance of purchase from cost savings. Federal and regional programs exist to further reduce purchase price and spur adoption.

According to the company, Orange EV has consistently been the first OEM approved for and delivering commercially available terminal trucks under incentive programs that can pay more than half of vehicle purchase price. Carbon credits on the emissions eliminated by Orange EV electric vehicles can generate even more savings.

“Even without incentive programs, the total cost of ownership for Orange EV's electric vehicles is often less than what many fleets spend to purchase and operate their diesel trucks,” according to Mike Saxton chief commercial officer at Orange EV. “The incentives help fleets invest in their initial vehicles, but it's the per truck savings of up to $60,000 annually that will drive fleet-wide adoption."

Follow @HDTrucking on Twitter

Cass Freight Index: Shipments, Freight Spending Continue Declines

Overall shipment volumes and pricing are persistently weak, with increased levels of volatility as all levels of the supply chain continue to try to work down inventory levels, according to the Cass Freight Index report for July.

This measure of activity in all domestic freight modes shows there have been a few areas of growth, mostly related to e-commerce, with lower levels of expansion in modes serving the auto and housing/construction industries.

All of this added up to slightly lower shipment volume in July, down 2.6% from a year ago and the 17th straight month of year-over-year declines. There was virtually no change in July from the month before, but the reading of 1.111 is the highest since September 2015.

What specifically drove July's decline in volume? According to Donald Broughton, senior transportation analyst at the investment firm Avondale Partners, who provides analysis of the figures, July year-over-year overall traffic for major U.S. railroads declined 6.1%, as intermodal units fell 5.4% and commodity carloads originated declined 6.9%.

As for trucking, he said tonnage itself appears to be growing, with the three-month moving average increasing 2.75% (not seasonally adjusted). However, he notes truck loads have contracted on a year-over year basis three out of six months in 2016.

“No matter how it is measured, the data coming out of the trucking industry has been both volatile and uninspiring,” Broughton said. He also noted the trucking industry provides one of the more reliable reads on the pulse of the domestic economy – and how it's changing.

“It gives us clues about the health of both the manufacturing and retail sectors,” he said. “We should note that as the first industrial-led recovery (2009-2014) since 1961 came to an end, and the shift from ‘brick and mortar' retailing to e-commerce/omni-channel continues, we are becoming more focused on the number of loads moved by truck and less focused on the number of tons moved by truck.”

When it comes to freight expenditures, the Cass Freight Index shows a July drop of 0.6% from the month before. It's also down 5.5% from a year earlier, with the measure registering 2.355, its 17th straight month of year-over-year declines. Expenditures are being pushed lower by a number of factors, according to Broughton.

“In part, this weakness is driven by the excess of capacity in most modes: trucking, rail, air freight, barge, ocean container and bulk. The weakness is also driven in part by the ongoing decline in diesel and jet fuel and corresponding fuel surcharges that influence pricing realized by shippers,” he said. “Although at first blush it appears that in most modes the gap between spot pricing and contract pricing appears to be closing slightly, this is more a function of slight declines in contract pricing than it is a function of improvements in spot pricing.”

Broughton sees little reason to predict a change in course or material strength in either the contract or spot rates for most modes. Exceptions to this do remain in the parcel marketplace and forms of expedited transit supporting e-commerce.

You can read the full report on the Cass Information Systems' website.

Follow @HDTrucking on Twitter